๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Middle East & Africa

West Bank and Gaza

The World Bank rates West Bank and Gaza's labor-regulation quality at 61.1/100 in the 2025 B-READY release.

B-READY 2025
61.1 B-READY labor quality (0โ€“100)
OECD EPL โ†’

West Bank and Gaza scores 61.1/100 on the World Bank B-READY labor-regulation quality index. Data is compiled from 1 official source (World Bank B-READY 2025), covering statutory notice periods, severance pay, and dismissal procedures.

West Bank and Gaza - the verdict

West Bank and Gaza scores 61.1/100 on the World Bank B-READY labor-regulation quality index.

61.1/100
B-READY labor quality

Sources: World Bank B-READY 2025. Higher = stronger statutory protection.

West Bank and Gaza carries moderate employment protection scores across the 1 international dataset we track (Middle East & Africa). B-READY 2025 labor regulation quality is 61.1/100.

What the Data Shows for West Bank and Gaza

Middle East & Africa. Covered by 1/3 tracked datasets. B-READY 2025 labor score: 61.1/100, moderate.

Dismissal process: slow, ~7.0 weeks. No 3rd-party approval required for individual dismissal.

Formal labor dispute resolution takes a moderate timeline, averaging 5.9 months. A moderate share of firms, 3.5% in the World Bank's survey, report experiencing a labor dispute. Employer social contributions are substantial here, 16.3% of salary, a significant cost layer beyond base pay. 6 peer comparisons below.

How to read the three measurement scales

These figures draw on three different measurement traditions, so read each one on its own terms before comparing across countries. The ILO EPLex composite condenses statutory termination rules into a single index from zero to one, where higher numbers mean stronger legal protection against dismissal. The World Bank Business Ready 2025 labor score runs from zero to one hundred and blends the quality of regulation with how well public services and dispute processes actually work in practice. The OECD employment protection index uses a zero to six scale and only covers member economies, but it offers the longest historical series, which makes it the better choice for tracking reform over time. A country can score strictly on paper yet still process dismissals quickly, so always weigh the statutory index against the practical estimates. Where a country appears in fewer than all three datasets, treat the missing measures as not yet collected rather than as a sign of weak protection, and revisit this page when new releases are published because indicators can shift year over year.

Data Sources

1

ILO / WB / OECD coverage

Region

Middle East & Africa

Geographic grouping

Latest Year

2025

Most recent indicator update

ILO EPLex
-
No data available
B-READY 2025
61.1
out of 100 ยท Rank #74
OECD EPL
-
No data available


B-READY 2025

Labor Regulation Quality

Regulation Quality
58.7
out of 100
Public Services
67.5
out of 100
Efficiency
57.0
out of 100
Notice Required
Yes
Severance Required
Yes
Weeks to Dismiss
7.0
Weeks Severance
2.6
Firms in Disputes
3.5%
Months to Resolve
5.9
Social Contributions
16.3%
3rd Party for Dismissal
Not required

Source: World Bank Business Ready 2025 World Bank Business Ready 2025 Pillar scores are 0-100 (higher = better regulation quality)


Frequently Asked Questions

What are the employment protections in West Bank and Gaza?

World Bank B-READY labor regulation quality: 61.1/100. (1 source.)

How does West Bank and Gaza compare to the OECD average?

Not an OECD member; B-READY score 61.1/100.

What notice period and severance pay does West Bank and Gaza require?

notice mandated; severance mandated.

What data sources cover West Bank and Gaza's employment laws?

1 source: World Bank B-READY 2025.

How strict are dismissal protections in West Bank and Gaza?

3rd-party approval not required; dismissal ~7.0 weeks.

How does West Bank and Gaza handle labor disputes?

disputes resolve in ~5.9mo; 3.5% of firms report one; social contributions 16.3% of salary.

What to do with this

Use West Bank and Gaza's scores as a comparison benchmark, not legal advice.

These indices reflect the law as written, not how it is enforced, recent amendments, or the facts of any individual case. For a real decision, confirm the current statute and consult a qualified employment lawyer, see our disclaimer.

Related

Data sourced from official OECD, ILO, and World Bank employment-protection datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEmploy Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from OECD, ILO, and World Bank labor market databases. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Primary sources: ILO EPLex, World Bank B-READY, OECD EPL.

PlainEmploy is rendered directly from the OECD Employment Protection Legislation indicators, the ILO EPLex database, and the World Bank B-READY labor pillar, no number is typed in by an editor. This country's composite scores and comparisons are computed directly from the underlying OECD/EPLex/B-READY tables, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-07-06.