Data Sources
1
ILO / WB / OECD coverage
Lithuania scores 2.24/6.0 on the OECD employment-protection strictness index.
Lithuania scores 2.24/6.0 on the OECD employment-protection index - above the OECD average of about 2.0. Data is compiled from 1 official source (OECD EPL), covering statutory notice periods, severance pay, and dismissal procedures.
Lithuania - the verdict
Lithuania scores 2.24/6.0 on the OECD employment-protection index - above the OECD average of about 2.0.
Sources: OECD EPL. Higher = stronger statutory protection.
Lithuania carries moderate employment protection scores across the 1 international dataset we track (Europe). The OECD EPL overall index is 2.24/6.0, ranking #39 of OECD-covered countries.
Europe. Covered by 1/3 tracked datasets. As an OECD member, it is included in the OECD's long-running historical EPL series. EU membership means its labor rules are also shaped by directives on collective redundancies, transfers of undertakings, and fixed-term work. The OECD EPL overall strictness index is 2.24/6.0, where higher values indicate stricter rules on individual and collective dismissal.
Detailed tenure-based notice and severance data is not published for Lithuania in the current release, so readers should rely on the aggregate scores above and consult national statutes for specifics.
Historically, Lithuania's OECD EPL score moved from 2.63 in 2014 to 2.24 in 2019, showing the direction of reform over time.
These figures draw on three different measurement traditions, so read each one on its own terms before comparing across countries. The ILO EPLex composite condenses statutory termination rules into a single index from zero to one, where higher numbers mean stronger legal protection against dismissal. The World Bank Business Ready 2025 labor score runs from zero to one hundred and blends the quality of regulation with how well public services and dispute processes actually work in practice. The OECD employment protection index uses a zero to six scale and only covers member economies, but it offers the longest historical series, which makes it the better choice for tracking reform over time. A country can score strictly on paper yet still process dismissals quickly, so always weigh the statutory index against the practical estimates. Where a country appears in fewer than all three datasets, treat the missing measures as not yet collected rather than as a sign of weak protection, and revisit this page when new releases are published because indicators can shift year over year.
Data Sources
1
ILO / WB / OECD coverage
Region
Europe
Geographic grouping
Latest Year
2019
Most recent indicator update
| Year | Overall Score | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2.63 | |
| 2015 | 2.63 | |
| 2016 | 2.63 | |
| 2017 | 2.63 | |
| 2018 | 2.24 | |
| 2019 | 2.24 | |
Scale: 0-6 (higher = more protective). Source: OECD Employment Protection Legislation database.
OECD EPL overall: 2.24/6.0. (1 source.)
OECD EPL 2.24/6.0 (below the ~2.3 average).
No notice/severance data for Lithuania yet.
1 source: OECD EPL.
No dismissal strictness data for Lithuania yet.
No dispute-resolution data for Lithuania yet.
What to do with this
Use Lithuania's scores as a comparison benchmark, not legal advice.
These indices reflect the law as written, not how it is enforced, recent amendments, or the facts of any individual case. For a real decision, confirm the current statute and consult a qualified employment lawyer, see our disclaimer.
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from OECD, ILO, and World Bank labor market databases. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Primary sources: ILO EPLex, World Bank B-READY, OECD EPL.
PlainEmploy is rendered directly from the OECD Employment Protection Legislation indicators, the ILO EPLex database, and the World Bank B-READY labor pillar, no number is typed in by an editor. This country's composite scores and comparisons are computed directly from the underlying OECD/EPLex/B-READY tables, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-07-06.