Comparison·Data through 2025

🇨🇷 Costa Rica vs 🇲🇽 Mexico

Employment-protection scores for Costa Rica and Mexico, side by side across ILO EPLex, World Bank B-READY, and OECD EPL.

Costa Rica vs Mexico: What the Data Shows

Costa Rica (Americas) and Mexico (Americas) are compared here using the three authoritative datasets on PlainEmploy: ILO EPLex, World Bank B-READY 2025, and OECD EPL. Costa Rica has data from 3 sources and Mexico from 3, producing 3 metrics where both countries can be scored on the same scale. OECD membership status: Costa Rica is a member, Mexico is a member, which affects the length and depth of OECD EPL history available.

On the ILO EPLex composite (0-1 scale, higher = stronger termination protection), Costa Rica scores 0.179 versus Mexico's 0.471 — a gap of 0.292 points in favor of Mexico. The World Bank B-READY 2025 overall labor score (0-100) places Costa Rica at 64.0 and Mexico at 58.7, with Costa Rica leading by 5.3 points on regulation quality, public services, and efficiency combined. The OECD EPL overall strictness index (0-6) shows Costa Rica at 0.85 and Mexico at 2.46, meaning Mexico has the stricter statutory regime by 1.62 points on OECD's composite scale.

Treat these scores as scaled summaries, not verdicts — they compress dozens of statutory rules into single numbers and can mask important detail. The largest normalized gap in this comparison is on EPLex Composite (ILO EPLex), where Mexico leads Costa Rica. To understand why the scores differ, open the full Costa Rica and Mexico profiles to see tenure-scaled notice periods, severance and redundancy schedules, trial-period caps, third-party approval requirements, and dispute-resolution timelines. The underlying sources — ILO, World Bank, and OECD — are cited directly next to each table, and this comparison page reflects the most recent data release for each indicator at the time of build.

When you compare two countries side by side, the most common mistake is to assume that a higher score automatically means better protection for workers. Each index measures something slightly different, so the comparison only holds when both countries are read on the same scale. The ILO EPLex composite captures what the law says about termination, notice, and severance, while the World Bank Business Ready labor score weights how efficiently those rules play out for employers and the OECD index tracks long term statutory strictness for member economies. Two countries can sit close together on one measure and far apart on another, which usually points to a gap between the letter of the law and how it is enforced day to day. Differences also shrink or widen depending on the reference year, because reforms land in different countries at different times. Use the year labels next to each figure to confirm you are comparing comparable releases, and treat any single number as one input into a fuller picture rather than a verdict on its own.

Metric 🇨🇷 Costa Rica 🇲🇽 Mexico
EPLex Composite (0-1) 0.179 0.471
B-READY Labor (0-100) 64.0 58.7
OECD Overall (0-6) 0.85 2.46

Key Differences

EPLex Composite (ILO EPLex): Mexico scores higher than Costa Rica (moderate difference).

OECD Overall (OECD): Mexico scores higher than Costa Rica (moderate difference).

B-READY Labor (World Bank): Costa Rica scores higher than Mexico (minor difference).

Related

Data sourced from official OECD, ILO, and World Bank employment-protection datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEmploy Editorial